It is one of the questions we receive most often:

“Is it better to build the foundation on screws or from concrete?”

The right answer is not that one of the solutions is always better.

A screw foundation can have an important advantage when the building allows point supports, machine access is possible, we want to reduce digging and wet works, and the screws can reach a suitable layer of ground.

A concrete foundation can be more suitable for basements, rafts, continuous foundations, heavy masonry, retaining walls or situations where the geometry of the building requires continuous infrastructure anyway.

And there are projects in which the right solution is a combination of the two: a hybrid foundation with screws and reinforced concrete.

Short answer

For modular houses, containers, terraces, Timber Frame, LSF and other lightweight structures, the screw foundation is worth analysing when the building can be supported at points.

For a basement, raft, heavy masonry, retaining walls or continuous supports, concrete often starts with a technical advantage.

The choice should not be made only by price or by material. Two complete foundations, capable of supporting the same building on the same site, must be compared.

What is the difference between a screw foundation and a concrete one?

Screw foundation

Point steel supports

Steel elements driven into the ground by rotation, positioned where the structure needs supports. They can have fixed flanges, special connections or extensions.

Concrete foundation

Point or continuous supports

It can mean isolated foundations, pad foundations, foundation beams, continuous foundations, a raft or infrastructure with a basement.

The building's loads are transmitted through the screw to the ground, and the behaviour of the foundation must be verified according to the project's loads: compression, uplift, lateral forces and moment.

Concrete usually works together with reinforcement and transmits the loads to the ground through the surface of the foundation.

ImportantNeither solution becomes correct just because it is made of a certain material. Both the screws and the concrete must be designed and executed for the specific building.

Screw foundation vs concrete: quick comparison

CriterionScrew foundationConcrete foundation
Diggingreduced in many projectsusually necessary
Wet worksvery low or none for the foundationyes
Actual installation timecan be very shortseveral stages of execution
Curing timenone for the screwthe concrete must reach the specified strength
Supportspointpoint or continuous
Sloping groundcan be advantageousmay require digging, steps or walls
Basementnot the usual solutionvery suitable
Raftnoyes
Dismantlingpossible in certain configurationsdifficult
Obstacles in the groundcan block screwingcan be excavated/controlled in certain situations
On-site testingpossible point by pointthere are other methods of control and verification
Intervention on the groundreduced in many projectsusually greater

The table is indicative. The advantages of a solution can disappear if the site or the building is not suited to it.

Which foundation is cheaper?

There is no universal answer.

A screw foundation can be more economical when it eliminates or reduces digging, formwork, reinforcement, soil removal, concrete transport, the concrete pump, restoration works and waiting time.

Conversely, concrete can become more economical when the building needs continuous foundations, a raft, a basement, retaining walls or massive infrastructure anyway.

The complete screw foundation

  • screws
  • installation
  • transport
  • connecting parts
  • any distribution beams
  • testing
  • site preparation
VS

The complete concrete foundation

  • excavation
  • removal of soil
  • compaction
  • formwork
  • reinforcement
  • concrete and pump
  • labour and restoration
The correct comparisonA complete screw foundation ready for the structure versus a complete concrete foundation ready for the same structure.

Is a screw foundation faster?

In many projects, yes. For lightweight buildings, installing the screws can take a few hours, a day or a few days, depending on the number of points and the site conditions.

Once the position, levels, verticality, connections and any checks provided for are accepted, the structure can be installed. There is no period in which the screw has to “cure”.

With concrete there are usually several stages

1
Setting-out and digging

Preparing the footprint and excavation.

2
Preparation, formwork and reinforcement

Successive stages before pouring.

3
Pouring and curing the concrete

The concrete must reach the specified strength.

4
Stripping, backfilling and preparation

Only then do you reach the superstructure stage.

But it is important not to confuse installation speed with the entire duration of the project. A screw foundation also has to be prepared: design, setting-out, checking access, identifying utilities, preparing the connecting parts and coordinating with the team that will install the building.

“Foundation in a day”It can be correct for installing the points in a well-prepared project, but it should not be presented as a universal rule for the whole job.
MARTETIC equipment and foundation screws ready for mechanised installation
MARTETIC mechanised installation. The speed of execution depends on project preparation, access and the real conditions on site.

When can the time advantage of screws disappear?

  • we meet boulders at many points;
  • there are old foundations under the site;
  • pre-drilling must be done at many positions;
  • machine access is difficult;
  • the special parts were not prepared;
  • changes to the structure appear before or during the work;
  • testing involves a separate stage.
MARTETIC foundation screws installed on sloping ground in Bușteni
Sloping ground and supports at different levels, an example from the MARTETIC portfolio.

Can the ground decide between screws and concrete?

Yes. And it is one of the most important criteria.

For screw foundations, the situations are generally favourable where the stratification is sufficiently known, the upper layer can be crossed and, at the required depth, there is a layer in which the product can work properly.

On the other hand, difficulties can appear when we have boulders, shallow rock, buried concrete, old foundations, fill with construction debris, significant variations in the ground, water or obstacles across much of the footprint.

In some of these situations, controlled pre-drilling, another position, another length or another system can be used. In others, concrete can become the more predictable solution.

The MARTETIC positionWe do not start from the idea that screws must be installed regardless of the conditions encountered. Sometimes the right conclusion can be: this is not the most suitable solution here.

Does meeting a stone during installation mean the ground is good?

Not necessarily. If the machine suddenly meets great resistance, it may be a dense layer, but it may also be a boulder, a piece of concrete, an old foundation or an isolated obstacle.

Forcing it to continue can deflect the screw or damage the product. The situation must be understood before drawing conclusions about the capacity of the foundation.

For the same reason, the hydraulic pressure observed at the machine is a useful installation parameter, but it must not be automatically turned into a guaranteed load-bearing capacity.

Does a lightweight building automatically mean a simple foundation?

No. The weight of the building is only part of the loads.

Compression

The weight of the building and the vertical loads push the foundation downwards.

Uplift

Wind can try to lift the corners and edges of lightweight buildings.

Lateral forces

Wind, earthquakes or other actions can load the foundation horizontally.

Moment

Posts, masts or frames can transmit significant moments at the base.

Settlement

What matters is how much each point moves and the differences between points.

Distribution of reactions

The loads do not reach all the points of the foundation equally.

It is not enough to say: “The house weighs 20 tonnes, so we divide 20 tonnes by the number of screws.”

When does a screw foundation have a real advantage?

Modular houses, LSF, SIP and Timber Frame

They often have clear support grids and can be integrated efficiently with a point foundation.

Containers and modular offices

The points can be positioned under the corners, longitudinal members and distribution beams.

Terraces and decks

The intervention in the yard can be reduced, and the foundation can adapt to level differences.

Sloping ground

Lengths and levels can be adapted to reduce massive excavation.

Sensitive sites

In certain projects, digging and the quantity of soil removed can be reduced.

Temporary buildings

Certain configurations can be dismantled later, if the product and the connections allow.

Weak ground at the surface

Modular systems can allow the upper layer to be crossed in order to reach a suitable layer further down.

Modular container on screwed steel supports, a MARTETIC project in Giurgiu.

When is concrete more suitable?

House with a basement

Screws do not form the basement walls and do not solve its waterproofing. Reinforced concrete is normally the main solution to analyse.

Raft

If the project requires a continuous structural slab, a concrete raft can be the logical solution.

Heavy masonry and continuous supports

Some structures work more naturally with continuous foundations.

Retaining walls

When the foundation must also take the earth pressure, reinforced concrete is usually the suitable solution to analyse.

Extensive obstacles in the ground

Controlled excavation can be more predictable than installing every screw among old foundations, rubble or rock.

Concrete needed anyway

If the project already includes a ground slab, ramps, retaining walls and massive concrete works, the advantage of eliminating it only at the supports can be reduced.

The important ideaConcrete is suitable when the geometry and function of the foundation require it. Screws are suitable when the foundation can work efficiently through point supports. It is not a competition between materials.

Examples for common projects

ProjectScrew foundation to analyseWhen concrete may have the advantage
6 × 3 m containerM76 / M89, depending on chassis and groundimpossible access or extensive obstacles
Assembly of containersM89 + distribution beamsif a continuous rigid platform is wanted
Modular house / LSF / Timber FrameM89 / M114 / V89 / V114raft or continuous foundation if the project requires it
TerraceM76 / M89few points and very simple digging
House with a basementonly special/auxiliary situationsconcrete for the raft, walls and waterproofing
Sloping grounddifferent lengths / V89 / V114stepped foundations and retaining walls
Thick filla modular system down to the suitable layerexcavation, replacement or another foundation system

These are examples of product families that can enter the analysis, not automatic recommendations. The final selection depends on the project and the conditions on site.

Case study: when we chose a hybrid solution

Screws + reinforced concrete

Sometimes the right question is “how can we use them together?”

In a MARTETIC project we had a site with very limited space and several underground utilities, where conventional deep excavation was difficult.

The solution was to build hybrid pile caps. The foundation screws were driven into the ground, then integrated locally into a solution with reinforcement and concrete.

The idea was to use the advantage of the screw for transferring the loads and the advantage of reinforced concrete for creating a rigid node adapted to the building.

Video from the project

A MARTETIC example of a hybrid solution with foundation screws and reinforced concrete.

ImportantPouring concrete around a screw does not automatically turn any configuration into a correct foundation. The connection between the steel, the concrete, the reinforcement and the ground must be verified.

Is a screw foundation more durable than concrete?

There is no correct answer expressed only as “screws last X years, concrete lasts Y years”. Durability depends on the design, the environment, the materials and the execution.

For screws

What matters

The steel thickness, the corrosion protection, the galvanising, the aggressiveness of the ground, the water, damage caused during installation, the connections and the possibility of inspection.

For concrete

What matters

The concrete class, the reinforcement, the cover to the reinforcement, the compaction, curing after pouring, water, frost, aggressive agents and the quality of execution.

Hot-dip galvanising to ISO 1461 is important, but on its own it is not a universal guarantee of lifespan in any ground. Both systems can be durable when they are designed and executed correctly.

MARTETIC hot-dip galvanised foundation screws, ready for use
Durability must be analysed through the product, the corrosion protection, the environment, the installation and the connections, not just through the base material.

Which foundation is better for the environment?

Screw foundations can have important advantages because they can reduce the quantity of concrete, the digging, the transport and removal of soil, the restoration works and the waste produced at decommissioning. Also, certain configurations can be dismantled.

But steel and galvanising also have a production impact. That is why it is not correct to claim that every screw foundation is automatically more ecological than every concrete foundation.

MARTETIC EPDMARTETIC has EPD documentation for the products covered. An EPD does not automatically mean “better than concrete”; it provides structured environmental data for comparisons made under comparable conditions.
MARTETIC screw foundations for modular buildings on an open site
A timber building installed on a screw foundation, a MARTETIC project.

Can the building be installed immediately on screws?

In general, yes, after the foundation has been accepted.

After installation, the following must be checked, according to the project and the work: position, levels, verticality, integrity of the products, connections and any tests provided for.

After this stage there is no curing period for the screws comparable to the curing of concrete. This is one of the important advantages for modular buildings and containers, where the foundation and the delivery of the structure can be coordinated within a very short interval.

Is a concrete foundation automatically safer?

No. Just as a screw foundation is not automatically safer either.

design + information about the ground + suitable products + controlled execution + correct connections + checks

A concrete foundation poured without suitable reinforcement, on an unsuitable bearing layer or without control of compaction does not become safe just because it is concrete.

Likewise, a large screw installed in the ground without knowing the loads and without a correct connection to the structure is not automatically a good foundation.

Do foundation screws work in any ground?

No. There are many situations in which the screw foundation works very well. There are also situations in which installation is difficult, needs another configuration or is simply not the right solution.

Boulders, shallow rock, old foundations, buried concrete, uncontrolled fill and water conditions can fundamentally change the solution.

Do screws eliminate concrete completely?

In many projects, the foundation itself can be built without concrete. But that does not mean that every building on screws must be completely free of concrete.

There may be a ground slab, a pavement, a ramp, a local pile cap, a retaining wall or another element of the building that requires concrete. And there are situations in which a hybrid solution is actually the right choice.

How do we choose between a screw foundation and concrete?

Before we compare the two options, we need some information.

1
The building

Plan, dimensions, height regime, building system and reactions if available.

2
The ground

Geotechnical study, water, fill, slope and site conditions.

3
The execution

Access, utilities, existing foundations, deadline and any later dismantling.

Ideally there should be the architectural plan, the structural or foundation plan if available, the dimensions, the height regime, the building system, the weight or reactions of the structure, the geotechnical study, information about water, photographs of the site, machine access, the slope, underground utilities, existing foundations, the execution deadline and the need for any later dismantling.

After that we compare safety, complete cost, duration, access, execution risk, necessary documents and behaviour in service. No single criterion should decide the solution on its own.

Frequently asked questions

No. It can be more economical when it reduces digging, formwork, reinforcement, execution time and restoration works. For basements, rafts or structures requiring continuous supports, concrete can be more efficient.

For lightweight structures and a suitable site, screws can be installed significantly faster because they require no pouring and no curing time. Project preparation and checks remain necessary, however.

Not automatically. Both solutions can be safe or inadequate depending on design and execution.

No. Shallow rock, boulders, buried concrete, uncontrolled fill and other conditions can change or prevent installation.

In everyday speech, the term “steel pile” is frequently used for foundation screws. In technical documentation, the product must be identified by its geometry, dimensions and documentation, not just by its commercial name.

For designed and permitted buildings, the geotechnical documentation is determined according to the project requirements and the applicable regulations. A trial installation or the machine's behaviour during screwing does not replace the geotechnical study.

Yes. Depending on the project, static compression and/or uplift tests can be carried out, to analyse the relationship between load and displacement of the tested point.

Certain configurations allow dismantling. Reuse should not, however, be assumed automatically. The product must be inspected, and the new site needs its own analysis.

The solution must be determined on the basis of the project, the geotechnical information and the real conditions on site, through the cooperation of the specialists involved.

Neither is always better. Screw piles are generally favourable when the ground can be crossed and a suitable layer exists at depth, and when time, access or minimal intervention matter. Concrete can be more efficient for basements, rafts or structures requiring continuous supports. Some projects use a hybrid foundation with screws and reinforced concrete.

Conclusion: screws or concrete?

If we have a modular house, a container, a terrace, a Timber Frame, SIP or LSF building or a lightweight structure, the screw foundation is worth analysing.

It can reduce digging, site time and the intervention on the site, and in many projects it allows fast installation of the structure.

If we have a basement, a raft, heavy masonry, retaining walls, continuous supports or extensive obstacles in the ground, a concrete foundation may be the more logical solution.

And sometimes the right answer is a hybrid foundation.

At MARTETICWe don't start from the idea that screws must be used on every project. We start from the building and the site. The good solution is the one that can be designed, executed and verified correctly for that project.

Do you have a project and don't know whether to choose screws or concrete?

Send us the building plan, the dimensions, the locality, a few photographs of the site and the geotechnical study, if there is one. We can analyse whether a screw foundation, a hybrid solution or the classic concrete foundation is worth discussing.

Send the project for analysis
Technical note. This article explains the differences between the two systems and gives indicative examples. It does not size a foundation and does not replace the structural design, the geotechnical documentation or the checks required for the building concerned. The final solution must be correlated with the structure, the ground, the loads, the access, the durability and the real conditions of the site.